To Self-Publish or Not
"I would like to write a book, but I am unsure where to start. Do I put the book together first then seek out publishers or vice versa?"
- Charles
Charles,
Great question. The answer really depends on your goals. Let me explain each approach some more:
The conventional approach to publishing is to write a book proposal (like a business plan, but for a book) and then find a literary agent. The literary agent will help you refine the proposal, hopefully find an interested publisher, and then professionally negotiate on your behalf. In return, your agent will get 15% of the deal. Once you have a contract, the agent will also help manage the relationship with the publishing house.
I took the approach of self-publishing. The main disadvantages to this approach are:
- It takes longer to self-publish and sell to a publisher than it does to go straight to a publisher.
- It takes your time and money to professionally produce a book.
- You take on the risk of the book having poor sales and not being able to find a publisher as a result.
The main advantages are:
- You test out and refine an idea.
- If you are able to garner good sales, you have potential of getting a publisher in addition to getting a good deal with the publisher. This occurs because you took on the risk and have proved the product's potential to a certain point.
- You have creative liberty.
- You have a high profit margin.
- You learn a lot about the industry by producing your own book and it is cheaper to do than ever.
- Depending on the publisher, you may not have to spend the time to write out a detailed book proposal since the book and its sales speak for themselves to a certain point.
Some books that were originally self-published are:
- What Color is Your Parachute, Richard Nelson Bolles
- The Celestine Prophecy, James Redfield
- The Elements of Style, William Strunk, Jr.
- In Search of Excellence, Tom Peters
- A Time to Kill, John Grisham
Posted at October 23, 2003 09:46 PM
| TrackBack