Main

November 08, 2005

Productivity Markup Language

This may be wandering a little too far off of the ODI reservation, but it's interesting, so perhaps worth a mention...

I am wondering if it might cool to design an XML language for productivity. That is, a standard, machine-independant language for describing to-dos and appointments. Basically, this would allow you to capture your life in one machine-readable file.

Along with this could be deployed a simple briefcase server. You can send it a copy of your file and it stores it. You send it an update, it updates it. You request the latest version, it sends it.

Why is that latter part cool? Because then we can allow the full power of open source to attack the problem of making better and more targeted productivity applications. For example, anyone could then program their own web interface. I log on to cooltodolist.com and enter my username and this website grabs my XML file from our server then displays it in some cool way. When you logoff cooltodolist.com it synchs the changes back to our server. Maybe, I'm going through a day where I care more about my calender, so I log on to calendarninja.com, which is someone else's interface that grabs this same data, but now does cool things with displaying the calendar. Hundreds of other web interfaces might also be made available. Your data is not stuck with one application. It is open and available to anyone whom you give your password. So anyone can try their hand at writing a program to display it. And you can try anyone with ease. Competition breeds innovation. Let's take the examples farther. People could start writing different apps to run on PCS, and Macs, and Linux machines. Each different app synchs the same data with our open server, but each doing something different and cool with it. Are you an outlook user at work? No problem. Someone can write a simple script for Outlook such that the first thing in the morning you do is download your latest file, convert it to Outlook format, and import it into the program. The last thing you do is export it out of outlook, convert it back to our XML format, and upload it to the server. Then, perhaps, on the way home, you think up a todo. No problem, maybe someone wrote a cool SMS-based program for your cell-phone. Or maybe you are on a public computer checking your e-mail, when you remember an appointment. Again, no problem, maybe someone wrote a nice e-mail interface where you simple e-mail "add appointment 'doctors on 11/8'" to some address that will sync it up with your data.

Your data rests with no one program or company. Therefore, you can use any program any one wrote at any time and get at your same list of to-dos and appointments. This gives incentive for people to write cool applications. They don't have to convince you to switch to their service as the center of your productivity universe. They only have to convince you to try it. You can use it as much or as little as you want with no inconvience, as your data is open.

To summarize, the key idea here is to open source productivity. More and more companies are trying to offer sleek productivity interfaces to your information (i.e., backpackit.com). But the problem is that each holds on to the data. If, instead, we give you a place to store your data and have it be available to any program that anyone writes (requiring your password of course), then entrepreneurial hackers can write hundreds of their own backpackit.com's. And you can try and switch between all offerings with ease, because none own your data.

October 17, 2005

Now Where Was I?

In addition to being generally fascinating, the October 15th NYTimes Magazine article, Meet the Life Hackers, got me thinking about how an ODI can enhance productivity via simplicity. The article mentions that some "sickeningly overprolific" workers utilize the simplest tools to manage their daily tasks -- "they find one extremely simple application and shove their entire lives into it."

Perhaps an ODI website can be promoted as the end-all simple solution for enhancing productivity and task management. A clean, ultra-simple Google-like user-interface that provides users with a place to record what they're currently doing before they get interrupted, record To Do lists in a clean and simple manner, etc. E-mail reminders can be sent from the website to remind a user to complete a task. Like del.icio.us, which allows users to record bookmarks from any computer, this site could be used to allow a user to record their tasks at hand from anywhere. Something that allows a user to return from an interruption and answer the question, "Now where was I?
There seem to be a million CRM tools with a thousand screens each, but not one extremely simple, easy-to-use personal productivity tool that's available online. Your thoughts?


NowWhereWasI.com - Discuss, discuss.

October 15, 2005

Tangent Rant: Transaction World: Extending the Pay-to-view ads

Time to put the futurist hat on.

Increasingly, our world is measured via transactions. I can imagine a world in which your earnings and credit limits are pre-estimated from birth. I can imagine a world in which desicion trees and their estimated ramifications are given to you at every turn to help you make more informed decisions.

Stepping back to a more realistic vision, I can imagine a AOL-esk service that gives you money for everything you do. Everytime you check your email, you can accept an ad or survey to make money. Everytime you read a news article online or anything... you are given an opportunity to make money in relation to what you are doing. Simple choirs make you money and build your reputation as a insightful consumer. Maybe employeers could read responses and hire based on the quality of one's participation in the service. You get credit for your day-to-day thoughts!

October 14, 2005

Pay-to-view ads

Michael mentioned in a previous posting those once hot dot-coms that paid people to watch ads.

Anyway, following Michael's earlier prompt, how could such an idea be revived again? Clearly, right now, the leader in in this field is freepay.com. This site has you fill out "offers" and then refer a bunch of friends. If all of these friends fill out "offers" then you get a free product. I'm not sure what one of these "offers" entails, but I assume it involves a survey and you giving permission to receive mail for the rest of your life.

What could we do better? Here are some ideas:

1) Focus on college students and recent graduates. An incrediably hot market. And we're young, which leverages our youth as a selling point.

2) Kill referral requirement. For me, at least, this is what stops me from something like freepay. If you were to offer me money or a product for spending my own time, I might do it given a lazy weekend and a low bank account. But I draw the line when it comes to annoying my friends. Of course, we could still reward referrals for those who want to do it. But we don't have to require it.

3) Use a graded focus group model. Instead of simply gathering some demographic stats and an address, what if we present the respondent with a privite wiki. The wiki contains the structure of a marketing plan (including pitch, pitfalls, discussion of the psychology of the target market, and how to position), and a bunch of pages of background material on the product. The respondent is asked to use the background material, and his or own insights and experience, to fill in the blanks of the plan. That is, basically construct a marketing plan web site from scratch. They key is to grade the responses on a scale of 1 to 10. The better your grade, the more money you get. Therefore, these young people have incentive to really put in some effort. If you give some shitty effort, then you might get a couple bucks. If you dedicate an afternoon to polishing some smart ideas, you might make a couple hundred bucks. Intelligence is rewarded. Insight is rewarded. Effort is rewarded. Many students will spend this time. Especially because the activity is engaging and interesting. And companies will kill for this level of insight into their target market. This info would be much stronger than what a focus group would provide. If you gather students into a room for an hour, they will either tune out, or worry obsesively about saying the right thing to be cool in the situation. Give them a web site to build on their own time, and offer them money for their insight, and they'll start turning out some gems.

4) The report variant. The problem with this above idea is that it's too service oriented. Each client requires a new survey, which we get paid for, but requires effort to setup. This could, of course, be very much automated. And the money could be very good for a system that requires very little work to calibrate for each new customer. But another variant is to use some of the funds to run our own surveys, and then anaylze these responses ourselves to generate a youth markeitng report to sell to companies. The advantage of this piece is that selling the same report twice costs as much effort as selling it 500 times. Comparable reports, by the well, currently sell to companies for around $15,000 to $20,000 a pop. A twist on this variant is to first approach some companies to fund the surveying in exchange for getting the report for free and having input on its direction. We, however, are free to resell it to anyone else we want at a nice profit.

The Wisdom of Crowds

I can already see the power of The Wisdom of Crowds developing in the following ways:

1. Ideation - We're starting to get ideas that evolve on other ideas. Also, existing ideas are evolving rapidly.
2. Implementatoin - Once ideas become refined enough, individuals who feel it can work can begin to dedicate time toward implementation. Furthermore, people who believe in the idea can very easily promote it.

As we recruit more people, it seems like both of these steps would be improved. Theoretically, more and better ideas would evolve. Also, good ideas would be less likely to be abandoned as individuals become more likely to find ideas they would like to implement.